Catalina 323 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Catalina 323
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3231996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerCatalinaNajad
Year2004–20091996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGerry DouglasJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 323
16.51
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 323
38.09
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 323
0.77
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 323
18.34
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 323 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 323 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Catalina 323 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Catalina 323 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.80m longer than the Catalina 323. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 323 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.51 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 323 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 323 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Catalina 323 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 323 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 323 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 323 · 1996 Najad 380