Hanse 320 vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison
Hanse 320
1978 C&C 24
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | 1978 C&C 24 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 1978–1983 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Canada |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 7 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The Hanse 320 is 2.60m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 207% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1978 C&C 24