Hanse 320 vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
1984 O'Day 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3201984 O'Day 30
General
ManufacturerHanseO'Day
Year2005–20101984–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1984 O'Day 30
19.36

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.78m longer than the 1984 O'Day 30. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 O'Day 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1984 O'Day 30