Hanse 320 vs Hunter 240 — Comparison
Hanse 320
Hunter 240
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | Hunter 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Hunter |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 1999–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 6.17 m (20.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 476 kg (1,049 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 8 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and Hunter 240 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 240 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 240 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 240 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The Hanse 320 is 2.60m longer than the Hunter 240. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 238% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 240, with an SA/D of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 240 has a comfort ratio of 15.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.88. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 35.0% for the Hunter 240, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The Hunter 240 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · Hunter 240