2006 Catalina 375 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

2006 Catalina 3752006 Catalina 375
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Catalina 375Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year2006–20132001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Catalina 375
16.24
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Catalina 375
41.17
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Catalina 375
0.75
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Catalina 375
18.62
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Catalina 375 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Catalina 375 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2006 Catalina 375 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2006 Catalina 375 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 2006 Catalina 375 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Catalina 375 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Catalina 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 2006 Catalina 375 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Catalina 375 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Catalina 375 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Catalina 375 · Hunter 380