Hanse 342 vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421978 C&C 24
General
ManufacturerHanseC&C Yachts
Year2006–20101978–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyCanada
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)6.10 m (20.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP7 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1978 C&C 24
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1978 C&C 24
40.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1978 C&C 24
0.85
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1978 C&C 24
16.77

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The Hanse 342 is 2.98m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 254% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1978 C&C 24