Hanse 342 vs Catalina 34 MkII — Comparison

Hanse 342 Hanse 342
VS
Catalina 34 MkII Catalina 34 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 342 Catalina 34 MkII
General
Manufacturer Hanse Catalina
Year 2006–2010 1995–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 10.30 m (33.8 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 9.20 m (30.2 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.0 m² (560 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 180 L (47.6 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and Catalina 34 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 34 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Catalina 34 MkII at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Catalina 34 MkII is 0.06m longer than the Hanse 342. The Catalina 34 MkII displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 34 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 34 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The Catalina 34 MkII offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 34 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS