2006 Hanse 350 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison
Hunter 30
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2006 Hanse 350 | Hunter 30 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Hunter |
| Year | 2006–2012 | 1991–1996 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Hunter Design Team |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.58 m (34.7 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.40 m (30.8 ft) | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.52 m (11.5 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 75 L (19.8 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2006 Hanse 350 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.
In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 1.44m longer than the Hunter 30. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · Hunter 30