2006 Hanse 350 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2006 Hanse 350 | Hanse 342 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Hanse |
| Year | 2006–2012 | 2006–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Germany |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.58 m (34.7 ft) | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) |
| LWL | 9.40 m (30.8 ft) | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.52 m (11.5 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 75 L (19.8 gal) | 100 L (26.4 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2006 Hanse 350 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 0.28m longer than the Hanse 342. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · Hanse 342