Bavaria Cruiser 34 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

Bavaria Cruiser 34Bavaria Cruiser 34
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria Cruiser 342000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerBavariaSabre
Year2010–20172000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerFarr Yacht DesignJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.25 m (33.6 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.15 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.0 m² (538 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria Cruiser 34
16.30
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria Cruiser 34
30.91
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria Cruiser 34
0.78
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria Cruiser 34
18.28
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria Cruiser 34 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 is a modern design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 was penned by Farr Yacht Design. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Bavaria Cruiser 34 measures 10.25m (33.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.33m longer than the Bavaria Cruiser 34. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria Cruiser 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.30 and 50.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria Cruiser 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Bavaria Cruiser 34 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria Cruiser 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria Cruiser 34 · 2000 Sabre 386