Hanse 315 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 315 | 1996 Najad 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Najad |
| Year | 2010–2016 | 1996–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Sweden |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.65 m (31.7 ft) | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) |
| LWL | 8.55 m (28.1 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.65 m (5.4 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs) | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 41.5 m² (447 ft²) | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L (22.5 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 315 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.90m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · 1996 Najad 380