2012 Hanse 385 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

2012 Hanse 385
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Hanse 385Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2012–20161988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.15 m (33.3 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.88 m (12.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,300 kg (16,094 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area67.0 m² (721 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hanse 385
18.09
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hanse 385
30.14
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hanse 385
0.80
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hanse 385
16.64
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hanse 385 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hanse 385 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2012 Hanse 385 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hanse 385 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.88m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2012 Hanse 385 is 1.34m longer than the Hunter 33. The 2012 Hanse 385 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hanse 385 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 67.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Hanse 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hanse 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 30.1% for the 2012 Hanse 385 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hanse 385 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Hanse 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Hanse 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Hanse 385 · Hunter 33