2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 X-Yachts Xc 422013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsBeneteau
Year2012–20182013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkFrance
DesignerNiels JeppesenVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA12.73 m (41.8 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.90 m (35.8 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.93 m (12.9 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths72
Cabins31

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 measures 12.73m (41.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.93m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 2.63m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 184% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3