2014 Elan 400 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison
2014 Elan 400
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2014 Elan 400 | 1976 C&C 33 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Elan | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 2014–2018 | 1976–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Slovenia | Canada |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.07 m (39.6 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.50 m (34.4 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.90 m (12.8 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 76.0 m² (818 ft²) | 42.0 m² (452 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 30 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 250 L (66.0 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2014 Elan 400 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2014 Elan 400 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 2014 Elan 400 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the 2014 Elan 400 measures 12.07m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.01m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2014 Elan 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2014 Elan 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2014 Elan 400 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2014 Elan 400 · 1976 C&C 33