2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2015 ClubSwan 36 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Feeling
Year 2015 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland France
Designer Juan Kouyoumdjian Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 11.00 m (36.1 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 9.90 m (32.5 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 3.30 m (10.8 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is 1.15m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Feeling 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS