Dufour 310 Grand Large vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Dufour 310 Grand Large
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationDufour 310 Grand Large1996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerDufourNajad
Year2015–20201996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceSweden
DesignerFelci Yacht DesignJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.43 m (30.9 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,150 kg (9,149 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast1,230 kg (2,712 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Dufour 310 Grand Large
15.74
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Dufour 310 Grand Large
29.64
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Dufour 310 Grand Large
0.78
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Dufour 310 Grand Large
18.25
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Dufour 310 Grand Large and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 310 Grand Large is a modern design by Dufour from France, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Dufour 310 Grand Large was penned by Felci Yacht Design. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Dufour 310 Grand Large measures 9.43m (30.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 2.12m longer than the Dufour 310 Grand Large. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Dufour 310 Grand Large has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.74 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Dufour 310 Grand Large offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 29.6% for the Dufour 310 Grand Large and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Dufour 310 Grand Large provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Dufour 310 Grand Large · 1996 Najad 380