Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 | 2000 Sabre 386 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Beneteau | Sabre |
| Year | 2016 | 2000–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | USA |
| Designer | Marc Lombard | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.34 m (33.9 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.35 m (30.7 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.39 m (11.1 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 measures 10.34m (33.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.39m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.24m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 · 2000 Sabre 386