Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Sabre
Year 2019 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Marc Lombard Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 9.53 m (31.3 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 8.65 m (28.4 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.10 m (10.2 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,300 kg (9,480 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 1,350 kg (2,976 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 43.0 m² (463 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 7
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
16.52
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
31.40
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
0.76
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
18.43
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 measures 9.53m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 2.05m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 69% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.52 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 31.4% for the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 150L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS