1972 Contest 31 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 311975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerContestPearson
Year1972–19821975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1972 Contest 31 is 0.92m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 54% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1975 Pearson 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 Pearson 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1975 Pearson 28