1975 Pearson 28 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison
1975 Pearson 28
1973 Ranger 33
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1975 Pearson 28 | 1973 Ranger 33 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Ranger |
| Year | 1975–1982 | 1973–1979 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Shaw | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 30.0 m² (323 ft²) | 43.0 m² (463 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1975 Pearson 28 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1975 Pearson 28 was penned by William Shaw. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 28 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.