1979 Peterson 44 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1979 Peterson 44 1979 Peterson 44
VS
2003 Sabre 402 2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1979 Peterson 44 2003 Sabre 402
General
Manufacturer Peterson Sabre
Year 1979–1986 2003–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Doug Peterson Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 13.41 m (44.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft 2.13 m (7.0 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,979 kg (22,000 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 79.0 m² (850 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 265 L (70.0 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Peterson 44
17.31
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Peterson 44
40.91
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Peterson 44
0.72
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Peterson 44
19.21
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Peterson 44 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Peterson 44 is a 1970s design by Peterson from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1979 Peterson 44 was penned by Doug Peterson. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1979 Peterson 44 measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 1979 Peterson 44 is 1.22m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The 1979 Peterson 44 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Peterson 44 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1979 Peterson 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Peterson 44 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1979 Peterson 44 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Peterson 44 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Peterson 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1979 Peterson 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS