1990 Contest 40S vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1990 Contest 40S1990 Contest 40S
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Contest 40S1976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerContestC&C Yachts
Year1990–20001976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsCanada
DesignerDick ZaalCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.25 m (40.2 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.5 m² (737 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Contest 40S
16.00
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Contest 40S
40.00
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Contest 40S
0.71
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Contest 40S
21.09
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Contest 40S and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Contest 40S is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1990 Contest 40S was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1990 Contest 40S measures 12.25m (40.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Contest 40S is 2.19m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1990 Contest 40S displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Contest 40S has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.00 and 68.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Contest 40S has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Contest 40S offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Contest 40S and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Contest 40S provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Contest 40S is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Contest 40S has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Contest 40S · 1976 C&C 33