2008 Najad 395 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

2008 Najad 395
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Najad 3951976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerNajadC&C Yachts
Year2008–20151976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenCanada
DesignerJudel/VrolijkCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.30 m (33.8 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,000 kg (19,842 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity350 L (92.5 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Najad 395
16.67
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Najad 395
38.89
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Najad 395
0.73
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Najad 395
19.88
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Najad 395 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Najad 395 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 2008 Najad 395 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 2008 Najad 395 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2008 Najad 395 is 2.04m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 2008 Najad 395 displaces approximately 98% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Najad 395 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.67 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2008 Najad 395 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Najad 395 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 2008 Najad 395 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Najad 395 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Najad 395 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2008 Najad 395 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Najad 395 · 1976 C&C 33