1990 Feeling 32 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison
1990 Feeling 32
1972 Ranger 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1990 Feeling 32 | 1972 Ranger 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Feeling | Ranger |
| Year | 1990–1998 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | USA |
| Designer | Philippe Harlé | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.01m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 48% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 1972 Ranger 29