1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1988 Moody 36 1988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1988 Moody 36
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Moody
Year 1994–2003 1988–1993
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden UK
Designer Olle Enderlein Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 8.85 m (29.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.02 m (9.9 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.50 m (4.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs) 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.0 m² (409 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 2.12m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS