2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyFeeling
Year2000–20101995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.33m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1995 Feeling 39