Hanse 400 vs Catalina 390 — Comparison
Hanse 400
Catalina 390
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 400 | Catalina 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Catalina |
| Year | 2002–2006 | 1997–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.60 m (34.8 ft) | 10.21 m (33.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) | 8,256 kg (18,201 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) | 65.5 m² (705 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 29 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 280 L (74.0 gal) | 265 L (70.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 400 and Catalina 390 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 390 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 390 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the Catalina 390 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.21m longer than the Catalina 390. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 390, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Catalina 390 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 39.6% for the Catalina 390, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Catalina 390 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 390 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.