Catalina 323 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

Catalina 323
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3231983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerCatalinaIrwin
Year2004–20091983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 323
16.51
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 323
38.09
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 323
0.77
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 323
18.34
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 323 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 323 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The Catalina 323 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the Catalina 323 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 323 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.51 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 323 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 323 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Catalina 323 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 323 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 323 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 323 · 1983 Irwin 32