1994 Catalina 320 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 3201994 Catalina 320
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Catalina 3201983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerCatalinaIrwin
Year1994–20071983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity133 L (35.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Catalina 320 · 1983 Irwin 32