Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Beneteau Oceanis 30.1Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBeneteau Oceanis 30.11996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerBeneteauNajad
Year20191996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceSweden
DesignerMarc LombardJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.53 m (31.3 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL8.65 m (28.4 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast1,350 kg (2,976 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
16.52
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
31.40
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
0.76
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
18.43
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 measures 9.53m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 2.02m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 74% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.52 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 31.4% for the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 150L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 · 1996 Najad 380