1977 Bristol 29.9 vs 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 — Comparison

1977 Bristol 29.9 1977 Bristol 29.9
VS
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1977 Bristol 29.9 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
General
Manufacturer Bristol Hallberg-Rassy
Year 1977–1984 1994–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Olle Enderlein
Dimensions
LOA 9.12 m (29.9 ft) 8.85 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.02 m (9.9 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Ballast 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.7 m² (427 ft²) 38.0 m² (409 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Bristol 29.9
16.41
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Bristol 29.9
41.18
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Bristol 29.9
0.76
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Bristol 29.9
22.50
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Bristol 29.9 and 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was designed by Olle Enderlein.

In terms of size, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 measures 9.12m (29.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 at 8.85m (29.0ft) with a 3.02m beam. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is 0.27m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.41 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, with an SA/D of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1977 Bristol 29.9 and 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1977 Bristol 29.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS